The writer of the paperargues that psychology does not equal moral education, and that there are significant differences in perspectives of objective orientations, theoretical basis, and operational mechanisms. However, should the psychology be over-exaggerated as parallel to, or to replace moral education, it would lead to the over-extension of implications of moral education, whose effect, in turn, would be diminished. This misleading concept might further help indulge in mistaking the true meaning of psychology for being much too easy, with a consequence of the theoretical parallax. Therefore, the writer concludes that the confusion of psychology with moral education is confusion of ethic norms and immoralism, so to speak. And it will impair psychology and moral education at the same time.