河北师范大学学报—

期刊信息

刊名：河北师范大学学报（教育科学版）Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition)
主办：河北师范大学
ISSN： 1009-413X
CN： 13-1286/G

教育部名栏入选期刊
全国中文核心期刊
CSSCI扩展版来源期刊
AMI综合评价（A刊）核心期刊
RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
全国高校特色栏目社科学报
中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊
全国高校权威社科期刊

友情链接

职业教育与普通中等教育关系之探——以“斯内登与杜威之辩”为例

收稿日期： 2017-03-13 PDF 下载 (307)

吴婵

作者单位： 北京师范大学教育学部, 北京 100875
起止页码： 59 - 66页
DOI： 10.13763/j.cnki.jhebnu.ese.2017.03.015

Snedden and Dewey on the relationship between vocational and secondary education

WU Chan

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

20世纪初期，职业教育与普通中等教育的关系问题，成为美国教育变革中极具争议性的焦点议题之一。支持独立职业教育体系的大卫·斯内登与支持综合教育计划的杜威，针对该问题进行了两轮笔墨较量。斯内登站在“为了效率而职业、为了职业而教育”的立场上，将教育作为提升社会效率的途径，建议职业教育自成体系，与公立中学并存不悖；杜威则站在“通过职业而进行教育”的立场，建议将职业教育作为普通教育的补充，纳入公立中学体系之内。二人的论争在某种程度上是对教育与社会现实关系的不同理解造成的，教育思想的差异决定了教育立场及实践方式的不同。二人的论争对20世纪美国公共学校变革，尤其是公共学校职能的转变产生了深远影响。对我国普通中等教育改革具有一定的启迪意义。

Abstract：

The relationship between vocational and secondary education is one of the most controversial issues in the reform of American education in early 20th century. While David Snedden favors a dependent vocational education system, John Dewey supports a comprehensive education plan. Both have even had a battle of words. The former holds the view of vocation for efficiency and education for vocation, claiming that education is the approach to promotion of social efficiency. However, the latter argues for education through occupation, claiming that the vocational education should be a supplement to general education, or as a part of the public secondary education. The debate has a far-reaching influence on reforms of American schools.

关键词

关键词： 职业教育 ; 普通中等教育 ; 斯内登 ; 杜威 ; 教育效率 ; 综合中学 ;

Key words： vocational education ; secondary education ; Snedden ; Dewey ; educational efficiency ; debate ; general secondary school ;

参考文献 14

[ 1 ] Paul Hanus. Industrial Education[J]. Atlantic Monthly, 1908, CI:60-67.
[ 2 ] David Sendden. Fundamental Distinctions between Liberal and Vocational Education//Journal of Proceedings and Addresses of the Fifth-Second Annual Meeting, Department of Superintendence[R].1914.
[ 3 ] David Snedden. New Problems in Secondary Education[J]. The School Review, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1916.
[ 4 ] David Labaree. How Dewey Lost:The Victory of David Snedden and Social Efficiency in the Reform of American Education[D]. Stanford University, 2008.
[ 5 ] John Dewey. A Policy of Industrial Education[J]. The New Republic, Vol. 19, Dec. 1914.
[ 6 ] David Snedden. Vocational Education[J]. The New Republic, Vol. 15, May 1915.
[ 7 ] John Dewey. Education vs. Trade-Training——Dr. Dewey's Reply[J]. The New Republic, Vol. 15, May 1915.
[ 8 ] John Dewey. Learning to Earn:The Place of Vocational Education in a Comprehensive Scheme of Public Education[J]. School and Society, V, 1917.
[ 9 ] Jeffrey Dow. The New Vocationalism:A Deweyan analysis[D]. University of Florida, 2002.
[ 10 ] 约翰·杜威. 民主主义与教育[M].王承绪, 译.北京:人民教育出版社,1990.
[ 11 ] John Rury. Education and Social Change:Contours in the History of American Schooling (3rd ed.)[M]. New York:Routledge 270 Madison Ave, 2009.
[ 12 ] David Snedden. The Problem of Vocational Education[M]. Boston:Houghton Mifflin, 1910.
[ 13 ] John Dewey. The Educational Situation[M]. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press, 1902.
[ 14 ] Paul Schilpp. Dewey on Education-Appraisals[D]. New York:Random House, 1996.