期刊信息
- 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition)
- 主办: 河北师范大学
- ISSN: 1009-413X
- CN: 13-1286/G
- 教育部名栏入选期刊
- 全国中文核心期刊
- CSSCI扩展版来源期刊
- AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
- RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
- 全国高校特色栏目社科学报
- 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊
- 全国高校权威社科期刊
论科举的双重角色:制度支柱与文化主脉
-
作者单位:(湖州师范学院 教育学院,浙江 湖州 313000) -
起止页码:28 - 35页 -
DOI:10.13763/j.cnki.jhebnu.ese.2025.05.004
The Dual Role of China’s Imperial Examination System: Institutional Pillar and Cultural Lifeline
摘要/Abstract
科举在中国实施了1300年,对唐宋以后的中国具有深远且全方位的影响,可以说,科举在中国历史上曾承担着制度支柱与文化主脉的双重角色。作为制度支柱,科举藉由持续再生产文官的功能,构建起稳固的官僚政治与君臣共治的政治架构,并为其他制度提供了坚实支撑。这种制度承载力既源于其对公正原则的坚守与无可替代的取士职能,又暗合中华民族对于一统价值的内在追求。作为文化主脉,科举的考试内容从诗赋到经义的转变,推动了儒家文化的发展,最终促成了理学主流地位的形成。随着明代功名体系的完善,地方士绅以理学为指导开展宗族建设与民间讲学,使文化深植乡土的同时,也为广袤疆域凝聚起共同的华夏文化认同。这两个维度的辩证统一、相辅相成,既彰显了中国传统的中庸智慧,亦揭示了科举绵延千年的深层逻辑。因此,对科举客观且深刻的评价,不仅有助于今人对自身传统的清醒认识,更于树立制度自信与文化自信大有裨益。
Implemented for over 1,300 years, China’s imperial examination system (Keju) exerted profound and multifaceted influence on post-Tang-Song Chinese society, serving simultaneously as an institutional pillar and cultural lifeline. As an institutional pillar, it established a stable bureaucratic-political framework through continuous reproduction of civil servants, enabling shared governance between monarch and officials while providing foundational support for adjacent institutions. This institutional capacity stemmed from its uncompromising adherence to meritocratic principles, its irreplaceable talent-selection function, and its resonance with the Chinese pursuit of unified civilizational values. As a cultural lifeline, the system’s evolution from poetry-focused to classics-oriented examinations catalyzed Confucian intellectual development, ultimately cementing Neo-Confucian orthodoxy. During the Ming Dynasty, local gentry—empowered by examination credentials—implemented Neo-Confucian principles through lineage construction and community education. This process simultaneously embedded elite culture into local societies and forged a cohesive cultural identity across China’s vast territories. The dialectical unity of these dimensions embodied traditional Chinese wisdom of the Doctrine of the Mean (Zhongyong) and reveals the deep logic sustaining the system’s millennium-long endurance. A rigorous evaluation of Keju not only facilitates clearer understanding of Chinese institutional traditions but also enhances contemporary cultural and institutional confidence through historical perspective.
关键词
参考文献 31
- [ 1 ] 钱穆.国史新论[M].台北:东大出版社,1976.
- [ 2 ] 刘海峰.“科举学”:一个广阔而专门的研究领域[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1999(4):15-17.
- [ 3 ] 苏秉琦.满天星斗:苏秉琦论远古中国[M].北京:中信集团出版社,2016.
- [ 4 ] 冯天瑜.周制与秦制[M].北京:商务印书馆,2024.
- [ 5 ] 谷宇.轴心制度与帝国的政治体系——中国传统官僚制度的政治学解读[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2011.
- [ 6 ] 王亚南.中国官僚政治研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,2010.
- [ 7 ] 孙国栋.唐宋史论丛[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2010.
- [ 8 ] 张希清.中国科举制度通史(宋代卷)[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2015.
- [ 9 ] 李弘祺.宋代官学教育与科举[M].台北:联经出版社,1972.
- [ 10 ] 张廷玉等撰.明史:第六册[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
- [ 11 ] 陈寿撰,裴松之注.三国志:第三册[M].中国香港:中华书局,1971.
- [ 12 ] 顾炎武.日知录集释全校本(中)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2006.
- [ 13 ] 陈邦瞻.宋史纪事本末:第一册[M].北京:中华书局,1977.
- [ 14 ] [日]原胜郎著.贡院之春[A].[日]宫崎市定著.科举史[C].马超云,译.郑州:大象出版社,2020.
- [ 15 ] 刘海峰.科举学导论(增订版)[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2025.
- [ 16 ] 何怀宏.选举社会及其终结:秦汉至晚清历史的一种社会学阐释[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998.
- [ 17 ] 许慎.说文解字[M].北京:中华书局,1963.
- [ 18 ] 陈植锷.北宋文化史述论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1992.
- [ 19 ] 胡应麟.少室山房笔丛[M].上海:上海书店出版社,2009.
- [ 20 ] [英]汤恩比著.历史研究[M].刘北成,郭小凌,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
- [ 21 ] 司马光.起请科场札子[A].司马光,李之亮.司马温公集编年笺注:第四册[C].成都: 巴蜀书社,2009.
- [ 22 ] [日]宫崎市定著.科举史[M].马超云,译.郑州:大象出版社,2020.
- [ 23 ] 刘业勤修,凌鱼纂.乾隆揭阳县志[A].中国地方志集成:广东府县志辑:第29册[C].上海:上海书店,2003.
- [ 24 ] 吴铮强.科举理学化:均田制崩溃以来的君民整合[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2008.
- [ 25 ] 周雪光.黄仁宇悖论与帝国逻辑——以科举制为线索[J].社会,2019(2):2-28.
- [ 26 ] 朱开宇.科举社会、地域秩序与宗族发展——宋明间的徽州,1100-1644[M].台北:台湾大学出版中心,2004.
- [ 27 ] 杨国强.科举制度和士人社会[A].杨国荣.思想与文化(15辑)[C].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2014.
- [ 28 ] 齐如山.中国的科名[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,2006.
- [ 29 ] 沈登苗.文化的薪火[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2015.
- [ 30 ] 焦循撰,沈文卓点校.孟子正义:上册[M].北京:中华书局出版社,1987.
- [ 31 ] 礼部纂辑.钦定科场条例[A].沈云龙.近代中国史料丛刊三编(474)[C].台北:文海出版社,1989.