Harvard University’s undergraduate admission system, which has been evolving since the 1920s, is a prime example of the holistic review process that prioritizes diversity and the broader development of students. This system reflects Harvard’s commitment to academic excellence, inclusivity, and expanding opportunities for a wide range of applicants. By fostering multi-party participation, Harvard has developed a comprehensive evaluation framework that serves as a model for American college admission reforms. This system emphasizes not only academic performance but also extracurricular achievements, personal characteristics, and potential contributions to the campus community. Additionally, Harvard employs special preferential policies for certain groups, including racial minorities, student-athletes, children of alumni, and the children of faculty, staff, and donors, all designed to enhance the university’s educational experience and cultivate a more diverse student body. Drawing on Harvard’s experience, China can reconsider the role of the national college entrance examination (Gaokao) and reimagine university admissions as a more holistic process. By adopting a comprehensive evaluation model, top universities in China can improve their admissions systems, better serve the needs of applicants, and foster a more diverse and dynamic student body.