期刊信息

  • 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition)
  • 主办: 河北师范大学
  • ISSN: 1009-413X
  • CN: 13-1286/G

  • 教育部名栏入选期刊
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • CSSCI扩展版来源期刊
  • AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 全国高校特色栏目社科学报
  • 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊
  • 全国高校权威社科期刊

高校德体美劳过程性评价研究

收稿日期: 2023-3-7 PDF 下载 (16)
  • 作者单位: (西安交通大学 a.人文学院;b.中国西部高等教育评估中心,陕西 西安 710049)
  • 起止页码: 6 - 13
  •        DOI: 10.13763/j.cnki.jhebnu.ese.2023.04.002

Process Evaluation of Moral, Physical, Aesthetic and Labor Education in Universities

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

加强高校德体美劳过程性评价,是深化新时代教育评价改革的重大现实需要。当前,高校德体美劳过程性评价存在价值取向偏差、评价指标单一、多主体协同不足、学生参与度不高、评价结果运用不充分以及持续改进质量文化尚未形成等问题。课程是高校开展德体美劳教育的核心载体,课外活动是内化课程教学效果的重要途径;课程教学与课外活动相互支撑,构成完整的德体美劳教育活动。为推进高校德体美劳过程性评价改革,应充分发挥教育行政部门、高校、教师、学生四类主体的协同作用,聚焦课程与活动两个场域,借鉴CIPP评价模型,从总体规划、综合改革、发展目标、学生发展需求等四个方面对情境要素进行评价;从队伍建设、课程建设或活动组织、设施条件、组织制度保障等四个方面对输入要素进行评价;从价值感、热情度、清晰度、活跃度、师生关系、内容广度、考试考核、材料与练习、总体反馈等九个方面对过程要素进行评价;从实施影响、成本效益、可持续性、可推广性四个方面对产出要素进行评价。为推进这一过程性评价的落实,高校应充分关注德体美劳过程性评价伦理、加强德体美劳教育投入、注重提升教师评价素养以及引导学生主动深度参与。

Abstract:

Strengthening the process evaluation of moral,physical,aesthetic and labor education in universities is of practical value to deepen the reform of education evaluation in the new era.At present,there are some problems in the process evaluation of moral,physical,aesthetic and labor education in universities,such as deviant value orientation,single evaluation indicator,lack of multi-agent cooperation,low students’ participation,inadequate application of evaluation results,and lack of quality culture for continuous improvement.Curriculum is the core carrier for universities to carry out moral,physical,aesthetic and labor education,and extracurricular activities are an important way to internalize the teaching effect of curriculum.Curriculum teaching and extracurricular activities support each other and put together a complete educational activity.We should make good use of the coordination among the administrative departments of education,universities,teachers,and students,and focus on curriculum teaching and activity implementation.Based on the CIPP Model,this paper puts forward a process evaluation framework of moral,physical,aesthetic and labor education from four elements,i.e. context,input,process and product.We should evaluate the context element from overall planning,comprehensive reform,development goals and students’ development needs;evaluate the input element from team building,curriculum construction or activity organization,facilities conditions,and organizational system guarantee;evaluate the process element from the sense of value,the level of enthusiasm,clarity,activeness,teacher-student relationship,content breadth,examination and assessment,materials and exercises,and overall feedback;and evaluate the output element from implementation impact,cost-effectiveness,sustainability and replicability.In order to promote the implementation of this process evaluation,colleges and universities should pay full attention to the process evaluation ethics of moral,physical,aesthetic and labor education,strengthen the investment in moral,physical,aesthetic and labor education,focus on improving teachers’ evaluation quality,and guide students’ active and deep engagement.

参考文献 10

  • [ 1 ] 李政涛,文娟.“五育融合”与新时代“教育新体系”的构建[J].中国电化教育,2020(3):7-16.
  • [ 2 ] 李牧.欧美高校本科教育中的美育观念与实践及其对中国高等教育的启示[J].美育学刊,2020(4):11-19.
  • [ 3 ] 刘向兵,柳友荣,周光礼等.全面加强新时代高校劳动教育(笔谈)[J].中国高教研究, 2021(4):9-13.
  • [ 4 ] 刘向兵,党印.高校劳动教育实施推进的多元与统一——基于80所高校劳动教育实施方案的文本分析[J]. 中国高教研究, 2022(5):54-59.
  • [ 5 ] 张乐乐,陈恩伦.新时代高校大学生评价体系建构:理念、原则、要素与框架[J].现代教育管理,2021(7):89-96.
  • [ 6 ] 李鹏.评价如何促进学习?——从泰勒到厄尔的探索与反思[J].外国教育研究,2020(1):31-44.
  • [ 7 ] Daniel L.Stufflebeam, Guili Zhang. The CIPP Evaluation Model: How to Evaluate for Improvement and Accountability[M]. New York, London: The Guilford Press, 2017.
  • [ 8 ] 乐晓蓉,胡蕾.新时代高校劳动教育的价值考量与整体推进[J].思想理论教育,2020(5):96-101.
  • [ 9 ] 周文叶,周淑琪.教师评价素养:教师专业标准比较的视角[J].比较教育研究,2013(9):62-66.
  • [ 10 ] 方展画,薛二勇.高等教育质量评估中的学生参与——以北欧五国为例[J].教育研究,2007(1):66-71.