期刊信息

  • 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition)
  • 主办: 河北师范大学
  • ISSN: 1009-413X
  • CN: 13-1286/G

  • 教育部名栏入选期刊
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • CSSCI扩展版来源期刊
  • AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 全国高校特色栏目社科学报
  • 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊
  • 全国高校权威社科期刊

对科举制度的再认识

收稿日期: 2022-9-5 PDF 下载 (5)
  • 作者单位: (华东师范大学 教育学系,上海 200062)
  • 起止页码: 1 - 8
  •        DOI: 10.13763/j.cnki.jhebnu.ese.2022.06.001

Imperial Examination System Rediscovered

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

科举制度作为一种以考试为方法,以选拔精英人才成为文官为目的的封建社会重要政治制度,是中国考试发展史上一个重要阶段。其产生是统一的中央集权统治的需要,曾经发挥过积极的历史作用,又随着时代和社会的发展而发生改变,并逐渐衰落,在面对西方工业文明时被终结,换来中国社会和教育加速近代化转型。科举制度虽被废除而考试却可以通过制度改革、内容更新、方法变换而得到延续。科举制度中的合理因素包括:考试选官,重视素养;设科灵活,多科网罗;公开报考,广泛参与;同场比试,公平竞争;严格管理,公正评卷。明清实行的八股文考试近年来引发极大争议,主要集中在八股文的政治作用、内容、形式、测试功能、文体等方面。八股文并非从来就有的社会生活必需品,而是科举的依附,科举不存,八股焉附?古代对八股的褒贬是由于存在利害关系,今人与八股已无直接利害,已可客观评价。八股文是历史文化,现代国家不可能以之为思想控制工具,个人也无须以之为技能而借以谋生,它失去了重新繁荣的社会条件。现代中国是多元社会,作为一种文体,八股文可以成为个人的兴趣、爱好,却不再具备通用价值,无法作普遍倡导。

Abstract:

The imperial examination system, as an important political system in feudal society, is an important stage in the history of Chinese examination, which selected elite talents to become civil officials by way of examinations. It came into being because of the need of a unified centralized sovereign. It once played a positive historical role, but it changed with the development of the times and society, and gradually declined. It was terminated in the face of western industrial civilization in exchange for the accelerated modern transformation of Chinese society and education. Although the imperial examination system was abolished, the examination continues through system reform, content update and method changes. The rational elements of the imperial examination system include selecting officials through examination oriented towards cultural accomplishments; flexible and multiple examining subjects to enlist able men; open registration and extensive participation; fair competition in the same exam; stringent regulations and impartial grading. The eightlegged essay exam implemented in the Ming and Qing dynasties has become quite controversial in recent years in terms of its political function, content, form, testing function, and style of writing. The eightlegged essay was not a necessity for social life, but a dependency of the imperial examinations. If the imperial examination exists no more, where does the eightlegged essay attach to? In ancient times, the mixed judgment of the eightlegged essay was biased by interest, but contemporary people no longer have a direct stake in it, so it can be evaluated objectively. The eightlegged essay is a cultural phenomenon in history. A modern state cannot use it as a tool for thought control, nor do individuals need it as a skill to make a living. There is no more social condition for its thriving. Modern China is a pluralistic society. As a style of writing, the eightlegged essay can become a personal interest and hobby, but it no longer has universal value and cannot be widely advocated.

参考文献 2

  • [ 1 ] 余秋雨.十万进士 [J]. 收获,1994(4):143-152.
  • [ 2 ] 朱有瓛.中国近代学制史料第一辑(下册) [M]. 上海:华东师范大学出版社,1986.