期刊信息

  • 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition)
  • 主办: 河北师范大学
  • ISSN: 1009-413X
  • CN: 13-1286/G

  • 教育部名栏入选期刊
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • CSSCI扩展版来源期刊
  • AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 全国高校特色栏目社科学报
  • 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊
  • 全国高校权威社科期刊

高等教育评估文化建设

收稿日期: 2022-1-15 PDF 下载 (3)
  • 作者单位: (1.加州大学 校长办公室,美国加州 奥克兰 94598; 2.华中科技大学 教育科学研究院,湖北 武汉 430074)
  • 起止页码: 28 - 32
  •        DOI: 10.13763/j.cnki.jhebnu.ese.2022.02.005

Developing a Culture of Assessment in Higher Education

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

评估是保障教育质量、践行社会问责的关键。虽然经过了二十多年的高校评估实践,形成了初具中国高等教育办学特色的评估模式,但如何确保评估的有效性依然是当前教育管理部门及高校面临的艰巨挑战,构建切合中国社会文化特征和高等教育发展的评估文化显得尤为重要。结合中国的国情及中国高等教育当前所处的普及化发展阶段的特征,总结评估经验和教训,借鉴美国评估文化建设中的组织管理文化、质量标准共识文化、循证文化、参与文化及质量改进文化等评估文化路径,针对我国当前高等教育评估存在的问题,构建政府、社会及大学三个层面涵盖的评估组织、质量标准共识、基于院校研究的循证评估、教师积极参与评估以及“评估-干预-再评估”等评估文化建设,对逐步形成稳定的评估模式具有重要作用。

Abstract:

Assessment is the key to ensure the quality of education and to perform social accountability. After more than 20 years of assessment practice in colleges and universities, an assessment model with Chinese characteristics for higher education has been formed. However, how to ensure the effectiveness of assessment is still a daunting challenge faced by the current education administration departments and colleges and universities. It is particularly important to develop an assessment culture in keeping with Chinese social and cultural characteristics and the development of higher education. In light of China’s national conditions and the characteristics of the popularization stage of China’s higher education, this paper summarizes the assessment experiences, and draws lessons from American assessment cultural approaches, such as the culture of organization and management, the culture of consensus for quality standard, the culture for evidencebased assessment, and the culture for participation and quality improvement, etc. In view of the problems existing in China’s current higher education assessment, developing a culture for assessment, such as constructing a threelevel evaluation organization by the government, the society and universities, a quality standard consensus, an evidencebased assessment utilizing institutional research, an “assessmentinterventionreassessment” model, and teachers’ active participation in assessment,etc., plays an important role in forming gradually a stable assessment model.

参考文献 14

  • [ 1 ] Richard Hersh & Richard Keeling. Changing Institutional Culture to Promote Assessment of Higher Learning\[EB/OL\].(2013-02)\[2022-02-08\]. https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/02/OccasionalPaper17.pdf.
  • [ 2 ] 翟亚军,王战军. 制度—伦理—文化:高等教育评估软环境的三个基本向度\[J\]. 高等教育研究,2014(5):36-40.
  • [ 3 ] Amos Lakos, Shelley Phipps. Creating a Culture of Assessment: A Catalyst for Organizational Change\[J\]. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2004(3): 345-361.
  • [ 4 ] Wendy Weiner. Establishing a Culture of Assessment: Fifteen Elements of Assessment Success—How Many Does Your Campus Have? American Association of University Professors.\[EB/OL\]. (2009-07) \[2022-02-08\]. https://www.aaup.org/article/establishingcultureassessment#.YZ0VC7qIaiM.
  • [ 5 ] 张继平.“双一流”建设语境中的学科评估中国化:成效、问题与进路\[J\]. 高校教育管理, 2019(5):44-51.
  • [ 6 ] Gary R. Pike. NSSE Benchmarks and Institutional Outcomes: A Note on the Importance of Considering the Intended Uses of a Measure in Validity Studies\[J\]. Research Higher Education, 2013(54):149-170.
  • [ 7 ] Center for Studies in Higher Education at University of California—Berkeley. Student Experience in the Research University.\[EB/OL\]. \[2022-01-08\].https://cshe.berkeley.edu/seru.
  • [ 8 ] Herbert Simon. Administrative Behavior: A Study of DecisionMaking Processes in Administrative Organization\[M\]. The Free Press. 1947.
  • [ 9 ] Russell Ackoff. From Data to Wisdom\[J\]. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis,1989(16): 3-9.
  • [ 10 ] Pat Hutchings. Opening Doors to Faculty Involvement in Assessment. \[EB/OL\].(2010-04) \[2022-02-08\].http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.450.9679&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  • [ 11 ] Kuh, G., & Ikenberry, S. (2009). More Than You Think, Less Than We Need: Learning Outcomes Assessment in American Higher Education. (Abridged version). Champaign, IL: National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment. Retrieved from\[EB/OL\]. (2009-10) \[2022-02-08\]. http://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/documents/niloaabridgedreport.pdf.
  • [ 12 ] Keston Fulcher, Megan Good, Chris Coleman, & Kristen Smith. A Simple Model for Learning Improvement: Weigh Pig, Feed Pig, Weigh Pig. \[EB/OL\]. (2014-12) \[2022-02-08\].https://in.ewu.edu/facultycommons/wpcontent/uploads/sites/129/2016/12/A Simple Model for Learning Improvement_Weigh Pig Feed Pig Re Weigh Pig.pdf.
  • [ 13 ] Hans Johnson, Patrick Murphy, Margaret Weston, & Kevin Cook. Higher Education in California: Performance Budgeting\[EB/OL\].(2014-11) \[2022-02-08\].https://www.ppic.org/publication/higher education in california performance budgeting/.
  • [ 14 ] 常桐善. 美国本科教育效能问责:“透明度”项目解析\[J\]. 中国高教研究,2019(9):54-62.