期刊信息

  • 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition)
  • 主办: 河北师范大学
  • ISSN: 1009-413X
  • CN: 13-1286/G

  • 教育部名栏入选期刊
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • CSSCI扩展版来源期刊
  • AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 全国高校特色栏目社科学报
  • 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊
  • 全国高校权威社科期刊

政治博弈视角下美国联邦非法移民教育政策的发展

收稿日期: 2020-03-06 PDF 下载 (171)
  • 作者单位: 沈阳师范大学 教育科学学院, 辽宁 沈阳 110034
  • 起止页码: 94 - 100
  •        DOI: 10.13763/j.cnki.jhebnu.ese.2020.04.014

Development of US Federal Educational Policy for Undocumented Immigrants: A Perspective of Political Game

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

随着特朗普政府一系列反移民政策的出台,美国联邦非法移民教育政策问题再次成为热议的话题。这个问题在美国历史发展中形成,并突显出一些特点。如联邦非法移民教育政策随着移民政策的变化而摇摆,非法移民的高等教育权利缺少保障,联邦与州之间存在分歧。从政治博弈的角度分析,这与美国选举政治密不可分。为了实现各自的政治目的,两党在博弈的过程中需要考虑国内公民的教育利益诉求、国内合法移民群体的诉求等博弈信息,并依据博弈信息选择不同的博弈策略。两党内部的党派力量变化使得博弈双方的力量此消彼长,形成了不同的联邦非法移民教育政策。

Abstract:

In the wake of a series of anti-immigration policies of the Trump administration, the issue of federal educational policy for undocumented immigrants in the US has once again become a hot topic. This historic issue has highlighted some characteristics: federal educational policy for undocumented immigrants sways with the immigration policy; the protection of higher education rights for undocumented immigrants is lacking, and there were differences between the states and the federal government. From the perspective of political game, this is inseparable from the American electoral politics. In order to achieve their respective political goals, the two parties need to consider the game information such as the educational interest demands of domestic citizens and the demands of legal immigrant groups, and choose different game strategies according to the game information. The power of both sides of the game is shifting with the changes in the partisan powers within the two parties, thus forming different federal undocumented immigration education policies.

参考文献 16

  • [ 1 ] Office of Management and Budget,A Budget for a Better America——Promises Kept.Taxpayers First[EB/OL].(2019-03-11)[2019-03-13].https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/budget-fy2020.pdf.
  • [ 2 ] 宁骚.公共政策学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.
  • [ 3 ] Frisby,C.L.,& Jimerson,S.R..Understanding immigrants,schooling,and school psychology:Contemporary science and practice[J].School Psychology Quarterly,2016(2).
  • [ 4 ] Passel,J.S.& Cohn,D..Trends in Unauthorized Immigration:Undocumented Inflow Now Trails Legal Inflow[J].Pew Hispanic Center,2008(2).
  • [ 5 ] Drachman,E..Access to Higher Education for Undocumented Students[J].Peace Review,2006(1).
  • [ 6 ] Morse,S.C.& Ludovina,F.S..Responding to Undocumented Children in the Schools[R].ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools,1999.
  • [ 7 ] Patel,P..Are DACA Students Still Safe to Stay?[EB/OL].The New England Journal of Higher Education.(2017-04-25)[2019-03-20].http://www.nebhe.org/thejournal/are-daca-students-still-safe-to-stay/.
  • [ 8 ] National Conference of State Legislatures.Undocumented student tuition:Overview[EB/OL].(2015-02-10)[2019-10-21].http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/undocumented-student-tuition-overview.aspx.
  • [ 9 ] Schmid,C.L..Undocumented Childhood Immigrants,the Dream Act and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival in the USA[J].International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy,2013(11/12).
  • [ 10 ] Gonzales,R.G.,Terriquez,V.,& Ruszczyk,S.P..Becoming DACA Mented:Assessing the Shortterm Benefits of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrival (DACA)[J].American Behavioral Scientist,2014(14).
  • [ 11 ] Zong,J.,Soto,A. G. R.,Batalova,J.,Gelatt,J.,& Capps,R..A Profile of Current DACA Recipients by Education,Industry,and Occupation[EB/OL].(2017-11-1)[2019-12-21].Washington,DC:Migration Policy Institute.https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/profile-current-daca-recipients-education-industry-and-occupation.
  • [ 12 ] Pierce,S.,Bolter,J.,& Selee,A..Trump's First Year on Immigration Policy:Rhetoric vs.Reality.Washington,DC:Migration Policy Institute[EB/OL].(2018-1-11)[2019-12-21].https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/trump-first-year-immigration-policy-rhetoric-vs-reality.
  • [ 13 ] 孙颖.美国移民儿童的生态公平与教育诉求[J],比较教育,2013(8).
  • [ 14 ] National Conference of State Legislatures.Undocumented student tuition:State action[EB/OL].(2014-06-12)[2019-10-26].http://www.ncsl.org/research/education/undocumented-student-tuition-state-action.aspx.
  • [ 15 ] [美]弗朗西斯·C.富勒著.教育政策学[M].许庆豫,译.南京:江苏教育出版社,2007.
  • [ 16 ] Nelson,S L,Glaubitz,K H,Robinson,J L.Reduced tuition benefits for undocumented immigrant students:The implications of a piecemeal approach to policymaking[J].Santa Clara Law Review,2014(3).