期刊信息

  • 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(教育科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition)
  • 主办: 河北师范大学
  • ISSN: 1009-413X
  • CN: 13-1286/G

  • 教育部名栏入选期刊
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • CSSCI扩展版来源期刊
  • AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 全国高校特色栏目社科学报
  • 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊
  • 全国高校权威社科期刊

西方童年研究的后现代转向及其教育学反思

收稿日期: 2022-3-20 PDF 下载 (2)
  • 作者单位: (湖南师范大学 教育科学学院,湖南 长沙 410081)
  • 起止页码: 56 - 64
  •        DOI: 10.13763/j.cnki.jhebnu.ese.2022.06.007

Post-modern Turn of Western Childhood Studies and Its Pedagogical Reflection

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

在反对童年的现代性观念的过程中,后现代话语进入到西方童年研究领域,产生出有关“童年是什么”的诸多新理解。如反对童年本质的普遍论,主张童年差异的本体论;解构童年研究中的二元对立思维方式,强调童年作为异质性集合,以“生成—儿童”来解构童年与成年的对立;以童年来消解现代性主体、重构后现代主体等。后现代童年研究将为教育领域带来一些积极的影响,如关注教育中儿童的差异而非统一抽象的地图、去除教育中的成人中心、重视教育中新的儿童主体形式建构等;与此同时,也将为教育学带来不少的挑战,如对童年的本质和好教育的追问备受质疑、由童年的消解所带来的教育存在根基的动摇、流动和变化的儿童主体形象建构所带来的教育意义缺失等。由此得出,当教育学向后现代的童年话语敞开之时,其蕴含的承诺与危险也将一并进入教育学领域中。

Abstract:

In the process of opposing the modern conception of childhood, postmodern discourse has entered the field of Western childhood study, resulting in many new understandings about childhood. These understandings include advocating anti-essentialism of childhood and the ontology of childhood differences, deconstructing the binary opposition in childhood study, emphasizing childhood as a heterogeneous collection and deconstructing the opposition between childhood and adulthood with “becoming-child,” using childhood as another form of subjectivity, and reconstructing the subject of post-modernism etc. Post-modern childhood study will bring some positive influences to the field of education, such as focusing on the diversity of childhood, changing the relationship between adulthood and childhood, and highlighting the construction of new forms of children’s subjectivity in education. But at the same time, it will also bring many challenges to pedagogy, such as challenging what is the real essence of childhood and good education, shaking the foundation of education due to the disappearance of childhood, and the defect in the value of education caused by the construction of a fluid and changing children’s image. It can be concluded that when childhood studies open up to postmodern discourse, so do the promises and risks that we must confront.

参考文献 31

  • [ 1 ] Allison James, Alan Prout.Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood [M]. London: Falmer Press, 1997.
  • [ 2 ] David Kennedy. Becoming Child, Becoming Other: Childhood as Signifier [M]. Anja Muller. Childhood in English Renaissance. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 2013.
  • [ 3 ] 冯俊. 后现代主义哲学讲演录 [M]. 北京:商务印书馆,2003.
  • [ 4 ] [美] 米勒德·艾利克森著. 后现代主义的承诺与危险 [M]. 叶丽贤, 译. 北京:北京大学出版社,2006.
  • [ 5 ] [法] 德勒兹, 加塔利著. 资本主义与精神分裂(卷2):千高原 [M]. 姜宇辉,译. 上海:上海书店出版社,2010.
  • [ 6 ] [法] 德里达著. 解构与思想的未来 [M]. 杜小真,译.长春:吉林人民出版社,2010.
  • [ 7 ] [法] 利奥塔尔著.后现代状态 [M]. 车槿山,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1997.
  • [ 8 ] 汪民安.后现代性的哲学话语 [M]. 杭州:浙江人民出版社,2000.
  • [ 9 ] [法] 阿利埃斯著.儿童的世纪 [M]. 沈坚,等译. 北京:北京大学出版社,2013.
  • [ 10 ] [美] 波兹曼著. 娱乐至死·童年的消逝 [M]. 章艳,等译. 桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2009.
  • [ 11 ] [英] 艾莉森·詹姆斯著.童年论 [M]. 何芳,译. 上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2014.
  • [ 12 ] [美] 达尔伯格著.超越早期教育保育质量——后现代视角 [M]. 朱家雄,译. 上海:华东师范大学出版社,2005.
  • [ 13 ] [美] 道格拉斯·凯尔纳,斯蒂文·贝斯特著. 后现代理论:批判性的质疑 [M]. 张志斌,译. 北京:中央编译出版社,1999.
  • [ 14 ] Jacques Derrida. Positions [M]. Alan Bass, trans. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1981.
  • [ 15 ] 麦永雄.德勒兹哲性诗学 [M]. 桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2013.
  • [ 16 ] Alan Prout. The Future of Childhood [M]. London and New York: Routledge Falmer, 2005.
  • [ 17 ] [英] 艾伦·普劳特著.童年的未来 [M]. 华桦,译.上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2014.
  • [ 18 ] Susan M. Turner, Gareth B. Matthews. The Philosopher’s Child: Critical Perspectives in the Western Tradition [M]. New York:University of Rochester Press, 1998.
  • [ 19 ] David Kennedy. The Hermeneutics of Childhood [J]. Philosophy Today, 1992, 36(1):44-59.
  • [ 20 ] Walter Omar Kohan. Childhood, Education and Philosophy: Notes on Deterritorialisation [J]. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2011,45(2):339 - 357.
  • [ 21 ] [美] 弗莱德·多迈尔著.主体性的黄昏 [M]. 万俊人,译. 桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2013.
  • [ 22 ] [美] 弗拉克斯著. 后现代的主体性概念 [J]. 王海平,译.国外社会科学, 1994(1):11-16.
  • [ 23 ] Jean-Francois Lyotard. Manimise [J]. Philosophy Today, 1992,36(4):419-427.
  • [ 24 ] Karin Fry.Lyotard and the philosopher child [J]. Childhood & Philosophy, 2014,10(20): 233-246.
  • [ 25 ] Jean-Francois Lyotard. That which resists, after all [J]. Philosophy Today, 1992,36(4): 402-417.
  • [ 26 ] David Kennedy. Changing conceptions of the child from the renaissance to post-modernity: a philosophy of childhood [M]. Lewiston, New York: The Edwin Mellen Press, 2006.
  • [ 27 ] [荷] 格特·比斯塔著.教育的美丽风险 [M]. 赵康,译. 北京:北京师范大学出版社,2018.
  • [ 28 ] [美] 理查德·维沃著. 思想的后果 [M]. 王珀,译. 南昌:江西人民出版社,2015.
  • [ 29 ] 苗曼.童年的本质:基于两种童年研究范式的思考 [J]. 安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2016(3):390-396.
  • [ 30 ] [英] 特里·伊格尔顿著. 后现代主义的幻象 [M]. 华明,译. 北京:商务印书馆,2000.
  • [ 31 ] [英] C. S. 路易斯著. 人之废 [M]. 邓军海, 译. 上海:华东师范大学出版社,2015.