期刊信息
- 刊名： 河北师范大学学报（教育科学版）Journal of Hebei Normal University (Educational Science Edition)
- 主办： 河北师范大学
- ISSN： 1009-413X
- CN： 13-1286/G
- 教育部名栏入选期刊
- 全国中文核心期刊
- CSSCI扩展版来源期刊
- AMI综合评价（A刊）核心期刊
- RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
- 全国高校特色栏目社科学报
- 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊
- 全国高校权威社科期刊
国外应用G理论进行概念图教学评估的实验研究
-
作者单位：1. 河北师范大学, 河北 石家庄 050016;
2.河北女子职业技术学院, 河北 石家庄 050091 -
起止页码：74 - 78页 -
DOI：
Application of the generalizability theory to G- map teaching assessment
摘要/Abstract
文章分析了Shavelson&Yue Yin等应用G理论进行概念图评估的实验研究。首先对G理论、概念图评估、C技术、S技术进行了界定;然后,阐释了Shavelson等运用G理论对C与S概念图技术的比较实验研究。结果表明C和S在技术上是不等价的,S技术的概化系数比C技术大;若达到预期的概化系数,单次测试下S技术需要的概念数少于C技术。因此,对于大规模的终结性评估,S技术相对于C技术或许是更好的选择;而C技术则可能更适合于课堂上的形成性评估。
This paper introduces the results of a study made by Yue Yin and Richard J. Shavelson on the ap plication of generalizability theory to the C and S technique research. T he first part of this paper is on the con cepts of generalizability, C- map assessment, C and S techniques. Then the G theory is applied to the technical qualities of C and S. Result shows that C and S are not technically equivalent. The G coefficients for S are larger than those for C. Furthermore, a D study shows that fewer items ( concepts) are needed for S than C to reach desired level of G coefficients. Therefore, S might be a better candidate than C in the large- scale formative as sessment, while C is preferred as a formative assessment in classroom.