期刊信息

  • 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
  • 主办: 河北师范大学
  • ISSN: 1000-5587
  • CN: 13-1029/C
  • 该刊被以下数据库收录:
  • AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 中国期刊方阵入选期刊
  • 全国百强社会科学学报
  • 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊

道教中老子、庄子地位差异辨析

收稿日期: 1999-1-30
  • 作者单位: 河北师范大学法政管理学院, 河北石家庄 050091
  • 起止页码: 37 - 41,56

The difference between Lao Zi and Zhuang Zi in Daoism

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

道家和道教是根本不同的两回事,但自道教依托《道德经》产生以来,两者又有了不解之缘。有趣的是,道家两位着名代表人物老子和庄子以及他们的着作在道教中的地位截然不同:老子被极力推崇,庄子倍受冷落。究其原因,一是道教自身的特点使然,二是老、庄本人及各自学说差异所致,三是由统治阶级需要所决定。

Abstract:

Daoist school (a school of thought in the Spring and Autumn and Warring States Periods)had nothing to do with Daoism (one of the chief religions in China).But since the founding of Daoism which was based on The Way and Its Power, Daoist school and Daoism had been closely connected.Lao Zi and Zhuang Zi,the two leading exponents of Daoist school,and their works were not equal in status,Lao Zi was highly praised while Zhuang Zi was left out in the cold.The characteristics of Daoism,the differences between the two figures, and the necessity of the ruling classes account for this phynominon.