期刊信息

  • 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
  • 主办: 河北师范大学
  • ISSN: 1000-5587
  • CN: 13-1029/C
  • 该刊被以下数据库收录:
  • AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 中国期刊方阵入选期刊
  • 全国百强社会科学学报
  • 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊

从《孔子诗论》与熹平石经谈《小雅·都人士》首章的版本问题

收稿日期: 2006-2-6
  • 作者单位: 台湾师范大学国文系 台湾台北
  • 起止页码: 93 - 98

A comparative study of the initial stanza of Festal Songs·Durenshi

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

《毛诗.小雅.都人士》首章“彼都人士,狐裘黄黄。其容不改,出言有章。行归于周,万民所望”,《左传.襄公十四年》引与本章后两句相同,而服虔注以为逸诗。《礼记.缁衣》引与本章几乎全同,而郑玄注以为“此诗毛氏有之,三家则亡”。《左传》为古文经,为何所引诗见于同属古文的《毛诗》,服虔却以为逸诗?今本小戴《礼记》应该属于今文系统,所引诗,已往学者也都归入三家诗,而郑注为什么会说三家诗没有呢?这些疑点,透过出土材料《孔子诗论》,肯定先秦确实有异于齐、鲁、韩、毛四家以外的诗学,文字和诠释都有所不同,服虔所谓逸诗,当是见于这种类似材料;透过熹平石经,应肯定石经所载鲁诗确实没有《都人士》首章,齐、韩当同,郑玄注也没有问题。

Abstract:

The author of the paper performs a comparative study of the different versions of the first stanza in Festal Songs·Durenshi.Whereas the concluding two lines of the poem are considered as the same in Zuozhuan,it is taken as only the prelude by Fu Qian and Zheng Xuan.Now that Zuozhuan and Mao's Poetry are both classics,why does Fu Qian hold a different point of view? The key to the mystery is found in the unearthed work,Confucius on Poetry,i.e.,apart from the four schools of poetry of Qi,Lu,Han,and Mao,other analects may possibly vary.Likewise,neither Zheng Xuan,nor Fu Qian is wrong.Xipingshijing maintains that the first chapter of Festal Songs·Durenshi is lost.