As an important subfield of oracle bone studies,oracle bone morphology holds unique value in authenticating oracle bone inscriptions, though it has yet to receive sufficient scholarly attention. Oracle bone morphology proves effective in identifying two types of forged inscriptions: those carved on nonYinxu divinatory turtle shells or animal bones, such as specimens using Brazilian turtle plastrons; and those that violate the conventions of Shang Dynasty oracle bone texts due to anomalous engraving techniques, such as inverted or horizontal carving, as seen in examples like F11 and F17 in the Collection of Oracle Bones Held by the Institute of History, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (Zhongli Cang). Oracle bone morphology also aids in reassessing cases where authentic bones were misjudged as forgeries due to unconventional presentation. Through scientific morphological reconstruction, such cases can be reauthenticated—examples include specimens such as Nos. 2182, 430, and 47 in Peking University Collection of Oracle Bone Inscriptions (Beizhen). Previously identified as forgeries, they have been confirmed as authentic after reorientation and positional analysis. Misjudgments of this kind are found across turtle plastrons, carapaces, and bovine scapulae. In the process of applying oracle bone morphology to authenticate oracle bone inscriptions, it is essential to conduct systematic comparisons using multiple types of plates, carefully distinguish between shield patterns and other marks, and integrate knowledge from other areas of oracle bone studies with modern technological methods. Such an integrated approach significantly enhances the reliability and scientific rigor of authenticity assessment.