期刊信息
- 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
- 主办: 河北师范大学
- ISSN: 1000-5587
- CN: 13-1029/C
- 该刊被以下数据库收录:
- AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
- RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
- 中国期刊方阵入选期刊
- 全国百强社会科学学报
- 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊
“Yet This Hell Must Be Destroyed”: Rereading White Light in Dialogue with Gogol’s Diary of a Madman
摘要/Abstract
鲁迅的《狂人日记》和果戈里的《狂人日记》两部小说,实际上只有表层的相似性,而不像一般人想象那样有着重要的影响与被影响的比较文学关联。就作品本身来看,果戈里的《狂人日记》写的是一个品行卑劣的沙俄底层“小公务员”一心想要升官而不可得,最终发疯死去的故事;鲁迅同名小说写的则是“狂人”看清楚了自己的真实处境之后清醒过来,“赴某地候补矣”的故事。真正与果戈里的《狂人日记》有着深层相通之处的,是鲁迅后来的《白光》。这篇接着《孔乙己》未完成的反封建任务而来的小说,深入揭示了“科举制度受害者”陈士成内心深处“吃人”的强烈欲望,把表面上令人同情的“受害者”实际上也是“受益者”,也是“想要吃人而不可得”的“吃人的人”的野兽的真实面目无情地暴露了出来。只有抛开把孔乙己、陈士成这样的“小人物”当作“受害者”的廉价而浮浅的同情,把《白光》与《孔乙己》联系在一起看,才能真正理解鲁迅对封建科举制度的批判,理解鲁迅彻底的反封建战斗精神。
Although Lu Xun’s Diary of a Madman (狂人日记) and Gogol’s work of the same title are often linked in comparative literary studies, their similarities remain largely superficial. Contrary to common assumptions of influence, the two works diverge significantly in thematic depth and ideological orientation. Gogol’s novella depicts a morally depraved minor official in Tsarist Russia, whose delusional aspirations for upward mobility end in madness and death. Lu Xun’s Diary of a Madman, by contrast, undergoes a moment of awakening—recognizing the cannibalistic structure of his society and choosing to “go elsewhere to assume a post,” a gesture charged with ambiguity but also potential resistance. Lu Xun’s text that more profoundly echoes Gogol’s is not Diary of a Madman, but White Light (白光). This lesser-discussed story, a continuation of the anti-feudal project left unfinished in Kong Yiji (孔乙己), offers a searing psychological portrait of Chen Shicheng (陈士成), a victim of the imperial examination system whose interior life is dominated by an unfulfilled, violent desire to “consume” others. In exposing the latent ferocity within the so-called victims of the feudal order, White Light complicates simplistic readings of “small characters” like Chen or Kong as merely pitiful. Instead, it reveals how the mechanisms of feudal power create individuals who are simultaneously victims and aspirants to the very violence that oppresses them. Only by reading White Light alongside Kong Yiji, and by moving beyond facile empathy, can we grasp the depth of Lu Xun’s critique of the examination system and appreciate the uncompromising radicalism of his anti-feudal stance.