期刊信息

- 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
- 主办: 河北师范大学
- ISSN: 1000-5587
- CN: 13-1029/C
- 该刊被以下数据库收录:
- AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
- RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
- 中国期刊方阵入选期刊
- 全国百强社会科学学报
- 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊
“虽无为而自发,乃有益于生灵”——孔颖达之问与《诗经》的文学阐释学
-
作者单位:
(山西大学 文学院,山西 太原 030006) -
起止页码:
106 - 112页
“Though Uncontrived,It Naturally Nurtures All Living Things”:Kong Yingda’s Hermeneutical Question and the Literary Interpretation of the Classic of Poetry
摘要/Abstract
孔颖达是《诗经》文学阐释史上的关键人物。这不仅是说他把文学经验带入了经学话语,极大地拓展了《诗经》的文章学和语文学内涵,更是指孔颖达在《诗经》学史上正式提出了“虽无为而自发,乃有益于生灵”这个重大的文学阐释学命题。之所以重大,就在 于孔颖达认识到“诗”与“经”之间的矛盾,并提点了一条以读者为中心的经学阐释之路。这种读《诗》法把诗意楔入了《诗经》学的意义结构,使得一种经学本位下的文学阐释成为了可能。正是循着孔颖达之问,宋以来的学者把经义建构之维从汉儒的作者中心转移到 读者中心上来,在不妨碍经学教化的前提下解放了诗意和诗歌人情的自然属性。对于今天的人们来说,如果坚持经学的教化本位,想要更加内在地谈论《诗经》的文学阐释史,就不应忽视孔颖达提出的文学阐释学原理问题。
Kong Yingda(孔颖达574-648 CE) represents a pivotal figure in the history of interpreting the Shijing (Classic of Poetry) as literature. His significance lies not merely in introducing literary sensibilities into Confucian exegetical discourse—thereby expanding philological and rhetorical dimensions of the text—but more fundamentally in formulating the seminal hermeneutical proposition “though uncontrived, it naturally nurtures all living things” (虽无 为而自发,乃有益于生灵). This proposition gains its importance from Kong’s recognition of the inherent tension between the Shijing as poetry versus as canon, thereby pioneering a reader-centered approach to classical exegesis. Kong’s methodology embedded poetic meaning within the orthodox framework of classical interpretation, enabling literary reading without compromising scriptural authority. His hermeneutical question subsequently redirected the trajectory of Shijing scholarship: post-Song Dynasty scholars systematically shifted interpretive agency from Han-Dynasty author-centered approaches toward reader-response paradigms. This critical realignment liberated the text’s poetic essence and natural human sentiments while maintaining didactic orthodoxy. For contemporary scholarship seeking to substantively discuss the history of literary interpretation within classical exegesis—without abandoning the text’s pedagogical foundations—Kong Yingda’s hermeneutical principles remain indispensable.