期刊信息
- 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
- 主办: 河北师范大学
- ISSN: 1000-5587
- CN: 13-1029/C
- 该刊被以下数据库收录:
- AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
- RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
- 中国期刊方阵入选期刊
- 全国百强社会科学学报
- 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊
The Aesthetic Connotation and Historical Evolution of Liu Xie’s Proposition “A Bell Weighing Thirty Thousand Jin Does Not Produce the Jingling of Fine Sounds”
摘要/Abstract
刘勰“万钧之洪钟,无铮铮之细响”的命题,学者通常理解为大物无小声,这种理解脱离了命题产生的古代乐学背景,并不准确。“铮铮”本可用来形容钟声,但在先秦钟磬乐退出历史舞台,秦汉乐器大规模更新之后,其所指发生了很大变化,转以形容弦鸣乐器所发出的高音。“细响”不是音强意义上的微小的声音,而是指音高意义上的高音。因此这一命题的音乐学意义是说洪钟这一类的体鸣乐器不易发出弦鸣乐器所擅长发出的高音。同时由于秦汉以后俗乐多用弦鸣乐器,“铮铮之细响”又可用作俗乐之象征,因此这一命题又体现出刘勰“崇雅抑郑”的音乐思想,并用以比拟经典传统与当时不良文风的对立。后世批评家基于不同的音乐观念,对这一命题的使用并没有完全遵循刘勰的本意,但从不同角度、不同层面极大丰富和发展了它的内涵,拓展了它的诗学阐释空间。
Liu Xie’s proposition that “a bell weighing thirty thousand jin does not produce the jingling of fine sounds” has often been simplistically interpreted as meaning that large objects cannot produce small sounds. This interpretation, however, overlooks the ancient musicological context in which the proposition was formulated and is therefore inaccurate. Originally, the term “zhengzheng” (铮铮) could describe the sound of bells. However, after the decline of bell-and-chime music in the pre-Qin period and the significant renewal of musical instruments during the Qin and Han dynasties, its meaning shifted to denote the high-pitched sounds produced by string instruments. Thus, “fine sounds” (细响) refers not to sounds of low intensity but to high-pitched tones in terms of frequency. The musicological significance of this proposition is that idiophones like large bells are less capable of producing the high-pitched sounds characteristic of string instruments. Furthermore, as secular music in the post-Qin-Han era predominantly featured string instruments, “the jingling of fine sounds” became symbolic of secular music. Consequently, Liu Xie’s proposition reflects his musical philosophy of “elevating refined music while suppressing popular tunes,” serving as an analogy for the opposition between classical traditions and the undesirable literary trends of his time. Later critics, operating under different musical conceptions, did not strictly adhere to Liu Xie’s original intent. Nevertheless, they enriched and expanded the proposition’s connotations from various perspectives and levels, significantly broadening its poetic interpretative space.