期刊信息

  • 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
  • 主办: 河北师范大学
  • ISSN: 1000-5587
  • CN: 13-1029/C
  • 该刊被以下数据库收录:
  • AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 中国期刊方阵入选期刊
  • 全国百强社会科学学报
  • 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊

选取异形词推荐词形的一般方法

收稿日期: 2024-7-15
  • 作者单位: (中国社会科学院 语言研究所/辞书编纂研究中心,北京 100732)
  • 起止页码: 109 - 120

A Systematic Approach to Selecting Standard Word Forms from Variants in Contemporary Chinese

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

《现代汉语词典》依据通用性、理据性、系统性这三个原则选取异形词推荐词形时是主次分明、相互参照的。使用的一般方法主要有:当不同词形都有理据,但理据的类型不同时,要依据权重高的理据;当不同词形都有语义理据且理据的权重相当时,要依据通用性原则;当不同词形都有语义理据且权重相当,词频也相差无几时,要依据系统性原则;当不同词形都没有语义理据时,要依据通用性原则;当某一词形的词频占绝对优势且稳定时,要依据通用性原则。上述方法是层层递进的,在辞书编纂实践中具有较强的可操作性,能够解决在选取异形词推荐词形时所遇到的绝大多数问题。因此,这些方法对现代汉语语文辞书的编纂以及异形词规范文件的制定也具有一定的参考作用。

Abstract:

This study presents a systematic methodology for selecting standard word forms in The Contemporary Chinese Dictionary, based on three hierarchical principles: universality, motivation, and systematicity. We establish a clear-decision-making framework that prioritizes these principles while allowing for their interplay in complex cases. Our analysis reveals that when variant forms exhibit different types of motivations, their relative weights must be evaluated. In cases where variants share equivalent semantic motivation, usage frequency (universality) becomes the determining factor. Similarly, when semantic motivation is equivalent and usage frequency is comparable, systematicity guides the selection. For variants lacking semantic basis, or when one form shows overwhelming and stable frequency, universality takes precedence. This progressive decision-making framework offers high operational value for lexicographers and has successfully resolved the majority of variant selection challenges in dictionary compilation. The methodology provides valuable insights for both modern Chinese dictionary compilation and the standardization of variant words in official documentation.