期刊信息

  • 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
  • 主办: 河北师范大学
  • ISSN: 1000-5587
  • CN: 13-1029/C
  • 该刊被以下数据库收录:
  • AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 中国期刊方阵入选期刊
  • 全国百强社会科学学报
  • 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊

沈长云先生在先秦史研究领域的重要贡献

收稿日期: 2024-1-10
  • 作者单位: (重庆师范大学 历史与社会学院,重庆 401331)
  • 起止页码: 1 - 8

Shen Changyun’s Pivotal Contributions to Pre-Qin Historical Scholarship

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

20世纪80年代起,我国先秦史研究领域进入一个思想解放、鼎故革新的阶段。沈长云先生伴随这一历程,通过求实创新的治学精神、独具一格的学术视野和科学合理的研究方法,对先秦历史的诸多重要问题提出了颇为深刻的学术观点,为先秦史研究做出了重要贡献。在国家起源等重要问题上,沈先生既遵循马克思历史唯物主义的基本原则,又主张理论与实际结合,同时还结合塞维斯“酋邦”理论和最新考古发现。作为中国古代“无奴派”早期代表性学者,沈先生提出中国古代不同于希腊、罗马,虽存在一定数量的奴隶制经济,但并非以奴隶制为主。相比五种社会形态说,中国古代社会演进道路更接近亚细亚生产方式。我国直接由血缘氏族组织进入早期国家形态,是氏族、部落首领由“公仆”蜕变为统治阶层,这种“家国同构”的权力结构成为帝制时代的君主专制主义的基础。在三代族源考索方面,沈先生坚持认为夏代是存在的,且夏族兴起于古河济地区,商族起源于晋中地区,周人、夏人没有族属方面的传承关系,周族起源于白狄。沈长云先生注重古典文献的考订、甄别,他参与点校的《国语集解》是海内外学者研究春秋史的重要参考文献。

Abstract:

Since the 1980s, the study of pre-Qin (prior to BC 221) history in China has undergone a phase of intellectual liberation and advancement. In tandem with this development, Shen Changyun (沈长云) has articulated profound academic insights into numerous crucial aspects of pre-Qin history. His work is characterized by a pragmatic and innovative approach, a distinctive scholarly perspective, and rigorous research methodologies, thus yielding significant contributions to the field.In his exploration of the origins of the State and other significant topics, Shen not only adheres to the fundamental tenets of Marxist historical materialism but also advocates for the integration of theory and practice. He also embraces Service R. Elman’s chiefdom theory and incorporates the latest archaeological discoveries. As an early proponent of the Wunu school, which challenges the presence of slavery in Chinese history, Shen posited that ancient China differed from Greece and Rome. While acknowledging some presence of a slave economy, he argued that it did not dominate society. China’s ancient social evolution, he argued, aligns more closely with the Asian mode of production. Shen contended that China transitioned directly from a consanguineous clan organization to an early state form, with clan and tribal leaders evolving from “public servants” to the ruling class. This “isomorphism of family and state” became the foundation of monarchy in the imperial era. Regarding the origins of the three ancient Chinese dynasties of Xia (BC 2070~BC 1600 ),Shang (BC 1600-BC 1046) and Zhou (BC 1046-BC 256), Shen affirmed the existence of the Xia Dynasty and traced its rise to the ancient Heji (河济) area. He posited that the Shang nationality originated in the Jinzhong (晋中) area, and he argued that the Zhou and Xia people had no clanbased inheritance relationship; rather, he claimed that the Zhou nationality stemmed from the Baidi ethnic group. Shen’s meticulous attention to textual research and his collation of classical documents, particularly his work on Guoyu Jijie (Commentaries on Discourses of the States), stands as a crucial reference for scholars, both domestically and abroad, studying the history of the Spring and Autumn Period(BC 770-BC 476).