期刊信息

  • 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
  • 主办: 河北师范大学
  • ISSN: 1000-5587
  • CN: 13-1029/C
  • 该刊被以下数据库收录:
  • AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 中国期刊方阵入选期刊
  • 全国百强社会科学学报
  • 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊

“中国特色中国风格中国气派” 古史话语体系的建构——从黎虎《中国古史分期暨社会性质论纲》谈起

收稿日期: 2021-5-20
  • 作者单位: (扬州大学 社会发展学院,江苏 扬州 225002)
  • 起止页码: 7 - 16

Constructing an Ancient History Discourse System with “Chinese Characteristics, Chinese Style, and Chinese Mode”: A Review of An Outline of the Stages of Ancient Chinese Society and Its Social Natur

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

黎虎发表于《文史哲》2020年第1期的《中国古史分期暨社会性质论纲——兼论中国传统社会的主要矛盾问题》一文(以下简称《论纲》),以本土化语汇概念,对中国古史分期暨社会性质这一重大史学理论和实践问题进行了全面、系统而深刻的阐释,为探索和建构“中国特色中国风格中国气派”(以下简称“三个中国”)古史话语体系、掌握古史研究话语权做出了开创性贡献。《论纲》主张厘清“舶来”话语的是非正误,乃是建立“三个中国”的史学话语体系和掌握古史话语权的前提;《论纲》主张准确揭示中国古史的矛盾特殊性——“权力是中国古代社会的主导者”及其主要矛盾关系,乃是建构“三个中国”的史学话语体系和掌握古史话语权的根本;《论纲》主张运用本土固有词语概念进行表述,乃是建构中国史学话语体系和掌握史学话语权的重要载体和必要组成部分,并迈出了实质性的一步。《论纲》及其学术贡献表明:运用本土固有词汇概念,不仅能够建构“三个中国”的古史体系,而且能够真正有助于掌握史学话语权。

Abstract:

Li Hu published An Outline of the Stages of Ancient Chinese Society and Its Social Nature: With a Discussion of the Principal Social Contradiction in Traditional China (the Outline) in No.1 of Journal of Literature, History and Philosophy in 2020. With concepts of local vocabulary, the Outline gives a comprehensive, systematic and indepth explanation of a major theorical and practical question in historical study regarding the staging of Chinese ancient history and its social nature. It has made a pioneering contribution to constructing an ancient history discourse system with “Chinese characteristics, Chinese style, and Chinese mode” (“the Three Chinas”) and to controlling the power of discourse in ancient history study. The Outline advocates clarifying the right and wrong of “borrowed” discourse, which is the premise of establishing the historical discourse system with “Three Chinas.” The Outline advocates accurately revealing the particularity of the contradiction in ancient Chinese history, i.e., “power is the dominant cause of ancient Chinese society” and its main contradictory relationship, which is the foundation of constructing the historical discourse system with “Three Chinas.” The Outline advocates the use of native words and expressions, which is an important carrier and necessary part of constructing the historical discourse system, and it has taken a substantial step in it. The Outline and its academic contribution show that the use of native vocabulary concepts not only helps to construct the ancient history system of “Three Chinas,” but also helps to control the historical discourse power.