期刊信息
- 刊名： 河北师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）Journal of Hebei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
- 主办： 河北师范大学
- ISSN： 1000-5587
- CN： 13-1029/C
- 该刊被以下数据库收录：
- AMI综合评价（A刊）核心期刊
- RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
- 中国期刊方阵入选期刊
- 全国百强社会科学学报
- 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊
A Review on the Interpretation of Chih Wu Lun in Kungsun Lung Tzu
摘要/Abstract
近代以前，注家以庄、儒或以佛解《指物论》，并未切近公孙龙所言之谛趣。而近现代以来，诸家开始借由西方逻辑学、语言学以解读《指物论》：逻辑学视野下之一系注家或以“指”为形色性等“物德”或以“指”为共相而以“物指”为物德，皆与公孙龙之意相去较远。而逻辑学视野下之另一系注家以“指”为“指而谓之”或“概念”则显然更切近公孙龙所言“指”之真意；然其牵绊于旧有的“客观主义”思维，对“物莫非指”“指非指”所作诠解仍与公孙龙致思之真趣相隔于一间。而语言学视野下的注家中，黄克剑先生则不再受制于传统的主客对峙思维，从相应于生命践履的别一种“语言学”那里找到了可契会公孙龙“物莫非指，而指非指”之本旨的蹊径，并继此对《指物论》作了自出机杼而又切近公孙龙原意的疏解。
Before modern times, commentators explained Chih Wu Lun（《指物论》） with Chuang Tzu’s thought, Confucian thought or Buddhist thought. Since modern times, interpreters started explaining Chih Wu Lun with logic theory and linguistic theory. Some announcers who explained Chih Wu Lun with logic theory interpreted “Chih” as properties of objects like shape, color and nature， and some interpreted “Chih” as universals and “Wu Chih” as properties of objects, which was far from Kungsun Lung’s（公孙龙） idea. Other commentators who explained Chih Wu Lun with logic theory interpreted “Chih” as denoting or concept, which was more in line with Kungsun Lung’s idea. However, their explanation was restricted by objectivism and slightly different from Kungsun Lung’s idea. Mr. Huang Kejian（黄克剑）, who was no longer subject to the traditional subject-object confrontation thinking, interpreted “Things are referred to by chih, but chih is not chih” and Chih Wu Lun with the special linguistic theory related to life practice, which was different from other views and closer to Kungsun Lung’s original idea.