期刊信息

  • 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
  • 主办: 河北师范大学
  • ISSN: 1000-5587
  • CN: 13-1029/C
  • 该刊被以下数据库收录:
  • AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 中国期刊方阵入选期刊
  • 全国百强社会科学学报
  • 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊

大数据的客观性与挖掘渗透理论

收稿日期: 2020-10-09
  • 作者单位: 江西财经大学 马克思主义学院, 江西 南昌 330013
  • 起止页码: 69 - 75

Big Data Objectivity and Mining Penetration Theory

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

随着大数据技术的兴起,一般认为大数据比小数据更具有客观性,因此人们提出要“让数据说话”的主张。大数据的客观性主要来自几个方面:数据规模更加海量,更具有全面性;数据格式更加多样,更具有代表性;数据存在于挖掘之前,没有理论预设;数据主要由智能终端自动生成,避免了人为污染。但因为数据生成人为设计、数据挖掘渗透理论、数据算法存在偏见、数据决策存在黑箱等,大数据也就依然存在着人的主观性渗透问题。因此,小数据时代的观察渗透理论变成了大数据时代的数据挖掘渗透理论。

Abstract:

With the rise of big data technology, it is generally believed that big data is more objective than small data, so people put forward the idea of "Letting the Data Speak for Themselves." The objectivity of big data mainly comes from several aspects: the data scale is more massive and comprehensive; the data format is more diverse and representative; data exists before mining without theoretical presupposition; data are mainly generated automatically by intelligent terminals, thus avoiding human pollution. However, due to the artificial design of data generation, the penetration theory of data mining, the bias of data algorithm, and the black box of data decision-making, the problem of human subjectivity penetration still exists in big data. Therefore, the observation penetration theory in the era of small data becomes the data mining penetration theory in the era of big data.