期刊信息

  • 刊名: 河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)Journal of Hebei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
  • 主办: 河北师范大学
  • ISSN: 1000-5587
  • CN: 13-1029/C
  • 该刊被以下数据库收录:
  • AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊
  • RCCSE中国核心学术期刊
  • 中国期刊方阵入选期刊
  • 全国百强社会科学学报
  • 中国人民大学“复印报刊资料”重要转载来源期刊

五帝说、三皇说的形成

收稿日期: 2018-09-24
  • 作者单位: 四川师范大学 四川文化教育高等研究院, 四川 成都 610068
  • 起止页码: 5 - 10

On the formation of five emperors and three sovereigns in ancient China

摘要/Abstract

摘要:

三皇五帝从时序说,三皇在前,五帝在后,但从三皇五帝说的形成看,则是先有五帝说,后有三皇说。而在五帝说出现之前,先有战国各种古帝王说,尔后才有五帝说的兴起。而五帝说可分为两个阶段,一是与五行说没有联系的五帝说,二是与五行说相联系的五帝说。在五帝说出现之后,才在西汉末期出现三皇说,到东汉已经有五种不同的三皇说。

Abstract:

Three sovereigns and five emperors are conventionally regarded as a sequential order of time whereby the three sovereigns precede five emperors. However, the writer argues that the five emperors precede three sovereigns in terms of formation, and preceding five emperors are ancient emperors of the warring states. In addition the five emperors are reconstructed as those with five elements and those without five elements in the legend. The three sovereigns come into the legend in the Western Han, much later than the five emperors. By the Eastern Han, there are varied legends of three sovereigns.

参考文献 13

  • [ 1 ] 顾颉刚.古史辨(第一册)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1982.
  • [ 2 ] 刘起纡.古史续辨[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991.
  • [ 3 ] 山海经·百子全书[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,1998.
  • [ 4 ] 管子.百子全书[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,1998.
  • [ 5 ] 郭庆藩.庄子集释[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
  • [ 6 ] 阮元刻.十三经注疏[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
  • [ 7 ] 李存山.反思经史关系:从"启攻益"说起[J].中国社会科学,2003(3).
  • [ 8 ] 刘向集录.战国策[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1985.
  • [ 9 ] 司马迁.史记(第一册)[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
  • [ 10 ] 吕不韦.吕氏春秋·百子全书[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,1998.
  • [ 11 ] 陈立.白虎通疏证(上册)[M].北京:中华书局,1994.
  • [ 12 ] 汪继培.潜夫论笺[M].北京:中华书局,1979.
  • [ 13 ] 司马贞.补史记·三皇本纪[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1999.