检索
在线阅读 --哲学社会科学版 2020年5期《“谎言”的述真与辨伪——一个符号学命题》
“谎言”的述真与辨伪——一个符号学命题--[在线阅读]
贾佳
成都体育学院 新闻与传播学院, 四川 成都 610041
起止页码: 13--19页
DOI: 10.13763/j.cnki.jhebnu.psse.2020.05.003
摘要
谎言既是人类重要的交际方式,又是人类意识世界中微妙情感的外现。不能否认人类的历史之中写满了“谎言”。任何文明的文学作品中都不乏有对谎言的描述,然而谎言与通常意义上的“假言”并不完全一致,这涉及符号发送者的意图目的性。在“谎言行为”中符号表意的目的不再停留于传达交流,而是通过符号文本圈定解释意义并使之落入意图意义的范畴之中。谎言之所以能够有效,在于符号的片面化感知以及副文本指示为说谎者建构再现世界提供了可能;谎言的无效则由于逻辑矛盾、副文本失效、第三者干预导致的谎言的区隔边界被暴露。

The Truth and Falsehooel of “Lies”——A Semiotic Proposition
JIA Jia
School of Journalism and Communication, Chengdu Sport University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
Abstract:
Lying is not only an important means of human communication, but also a manifestation of subtle emotions in the world of human consciousness. There is no denying that human history is full of "lies." There are many descriptions of lies in the literary works of any civilization. However, lies are not completely consistent with "falsehood" in the usual sense, for they involve the intention and purpose of the sender of the symbols.The purpose of symbolic representation in "lying behavior" is no longer to convey and communicate, but to delineate the meaning of interpretation into the category of intentional meaning through symbolic text. The reason why lies can be effective is that the one-sided perception of symbols and the paratext message provide the possibility for the liar to construct and reproduce the world; while lies are ineffective because the partitioning boundary of lies are exposed due to logic contradiction, paratext failure and other third-party intervention.

收稿日期: 2020-05-05
基金项目:

参考文献:
[1]A.Isenberg."Deontology and the Ethics of Lying",in Aesthetics and Theory of Criticism:Selected Essays of Arnold Isenberg, Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1973.
[2][古希腊]柏拉图等.论谎言[M].侯勇,赵光欣译.北京:中国对外翻译出版公司,1995.
[3][德]埃德蒙德·胡塞尔.逻辑研究(第2卷)[M].倪梁康译.上海:上海译文出版社,2006.
[4]列宁全集(第18卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1988.
[5][美]保罗·埃克曼.说谎[M].邓伯宸译.北京.生活·读书·新知三联书店,2008.
[6]赵毅衡.诚信与谎言之外:符号表意的"接受原则"[J].文艺研究,2010(1).
[7]刘维邦.数字时代身体、符号与审美之关系[J].符号与传媒,2019(2).
[8]Umberto Eco.A Theory of Semiotics.Bloomington:Indiana University Press,1976.
[9]赵毅衡.哲学符号学:意义世界的形成[M].成都:四川大学出版社,2017.
[10]孙凤,屠友祥.论维尔比夫人的翻译哲学思想[J].符号与传媒,2019(2).
[11]赵毅衡.符号学原理与推演[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2016.
[12]Kant.Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals:With on a Supposed Right to Lie Because of Philanthropic Concerns. Cambridge:Hackett Publishing Company,Inc.,1993.
[13]赵毅衡.论区隔:意义活动的前提[J].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015(2).
[14]赵毅衡.广义叙述学[M].成都:四川大学出版社,2013.
[15]赵毅衡.论虚构叙述的"双区隔"原则[J].外国文学研究,2014(2).
[16]羊芙葳.谎言的识别[M].北京:商务印书馆,2012.
[17][后晋]刘昫.旧唐书卷一〇二[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1995.